A and E shall be punished by each fine of KRW 700,00, Defendant B, C, and D, respectively, by a fine of KRW 500,000.

The defendants are the defendants.

The Defendants are members of the G Association in the Jeonjin-gu Seoul Metropolitan City F, and at the election of executives of the H above on January 27, 2018, Defendant A, Defendant B, Defendant C, and Defendant D are the vice-chief director, each director, and Defendant E are the persons elected by the auditor.

On January 19, 2018, the Defendants informed that the Defendants received the recommendation of the screening committee member in preparation for the above election at the above partnership office, and discussed the method of getting the Defendants elected, the Defendants conspired to enter the Defendants’ names in the name, affix a red yellow sign on the name side sign, and the other candidates who did not receive the recommendation of the screening committee are recorded only gender, and the name is x the name is x the name is x the name is x the name is x the candidate list.

Accordingly, around the 20th day of the same month, Defendant A, Defendant B, Defendant C, and Defendant D engaged in an election campaign in such a way that they visit the Ma channel, Nropo, in order from around 15:00 to 16:00 of the same day by showing or dividing the above list of candidates prepared by the members in order to visit the Maropo, Nropo, Seoul, and Nropo, and then bring about to the K's stores located in the J of Seo-gu, Young-gu, Seoul. Defendant C copied some of them, and Defendant A and Defendant D carried out an election campaign in such a way as to appeal the support for the Defendants by showing or dividing the list of candidates prepared as above.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each legal statement of the witnessO, P, Q, R and S;

1. Each prosecutor's interrogation protocol against the Defendants

1. A certificate (No. 39 No. 5);

1. Reasons for conviction of the original ballot paper (No. 40 No. 50);

1. As to the public offering relation

A. Both the Defendants are ambiguous or agreed on the preparation and delivery of the instant candidate list.