On December 05, 2012, at around 00:01, the Defendant driven a CYF rocketing taxi, and proceeded two lanes from the west-gu, Gwangju to the east-dong at the speed of 83.6km from the east-do to the east-do.

At this point, the speed limit is 60km per hour, and at that time, the front is not well visible at night, so in such a case, the person engaged in driving service has a duty of care to reduce the speed and drive safely by checking well the right and the right.

Nevertheless, the Defendant did not find out the victim D (39 years of age) who was unauthorized to the right side of the direction from the left side of the course due to the negligence that operated rapidly more than 20 km per hour on the road, and shocked the above victim by the front driver of the said taxi.

The Defendant suffered from the injury of the victim E (V, 57 years of age) who was on board the said taxi as a passenger by occupational negligence as above, such as light dump dume, etc. which requires approximately three-day medical treatment, and the victim D died due to a pelvisum, cump damage, celebrat damage, celeical shock, etc. at around 22:25 on the same day.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. E statements;

1. A medical certificate (E) and a death certificate;

1. A traffic accident report (i.e., sawbox, boomor photograph, and evidence/record of the traffic accident;

1. Each investigation report (25 pages, 46 pages of investigation records);

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes of comprehensive traffic accident analysis;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts, Article 3 (1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents by the Selection of Punishment, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, Article 3 (1) and the proviso to (2) 3 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. At the time of the accident of the reason for the selective sentencing of the selective imprisonment without prison labor, the location where the accident occurred was the intersection where the crosswalk was installed, and the visible distance of the defendant who driven the vehicle at the time was considerably limited.