beta
(영문) 수원지방법원성남지원 2019.06.13 2017가합404418

손해배상(기)

Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. On October 18, 2016, around 22:55, the Defendant: (a) was able to take care of the Plaintiff on the ground that the Plaintiff, who was a vegetable resident, filed a 112 report in another case in the previous case; and (b) on the ground that the Plaintiff, who was a vegetable plant, was in a vegetable lid with water from the Plaintiff, was in a vegetable lid; and (c) on the ground that the Plaintiff’s face and her body was fryed, the Defendant was unable to take care of about seven (7) weeks of the Plaintiff’s face and her body due to drinking science, and was in a vegetable bridge, internal and external wall cutting, approximately eight (8) weeks of the external wall vegetable disease, damage to the vegetable and 12 (hereinafter “instant act of violence”); (d) the Defendant was unable to take care of any dispute between the parties to the instant case and the Defendant’s remaining 315 (hereinafter referred to the same).

According to the above facts of recognition, the defendant is responsible for compensating the plaintiff as the perpetrator of the act of violence of this case (the illegal act of Article 750 of the Civil Act) against the plaintiff.

2. Scope of liability for damages

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion is based on the Plaintiff’s reimbursement of KRW 268,507,717 [2,115,725 won (urban daily wage) 】 50% (labor disability loss rate under class 8(1) of attached Table 2 of the Enforcement Decree of the State Compensation Act 】 253.821 (No. 18,243,766 won for the period between 23 and 60 years of age), 18,751,483 won for total 36,751,483 won for the loss of trial force (=268,507,717, 18, 2463, 500,000 won for the loss of trial force) and damages for delay thereof (=268,506,717,717, 246, 500,000 won for delay).

B. Judgment 1 passive damage: According to the result of partial physical appraisal commission for the inside and outside of the hospital of this Court, the Plaintiff is also dismissed.