마약류관리에관한법률위반(향정)등
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Punishment of the crime
1. Even if the Defendant is not a narcotics handler, on December 2013, at the Defendant’s house located in Suwon-gu Busan Metropolitan City C Apartment 104 Do 1404, the Defendant administered the psychotropic drugs, which are psychotropic drugs, in a coffee.
2. Even if the Defendant is not a narcotics handler, the Defendant administered philophones in the same manner as indicated in paragraph (1) around March 2014 at the same place as indicated in paragraph (1).
3. Although the Defendant is not a narcotics handler, on May 2014, the Defendant administered philophones in the same manner as indicated in paragraph (1) in the same manner as that of paragraph (1).
4. The Defendant thought that the husband D, who was detained due to the victim E’s information in the case of violation of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, etc. (narcotics), was detained by the victim’s report, and had the victim flickly report to the investigation agency on the charge of the use of clopon medication. On June 18, 2014, the Defendant suggested the victim to drink with the victim and drink the alcohol together with the victim to drink the alcohol, and made a further drink with the victim, and had the victim floply administered the alcohol to the “G” 702 head, located in Busan Flop-gu, Busan, on June 19, 2014, with the victim around 01:0 on June 19, 201, the Defendant reported the victim to the police station on the use of copon medication by leaving the phone, although the victim did not have administered the copon.
As a result, the Defendant reported false facts to an investigative agency for the purpose of having the victim criminal punishment.
5. The Defendant, upon receiving a report under paragraph 4, sent the victim to the Busan Urban Police Station to the Busan Urban Police Station and carried out a urine test, intended to take measures to invalid the victim due to the detection of phiphone ingredients, and reported the fact that the Defendant administered phiphones on the part of the Defendant, and then was the victim of the “balonhyi mulberry” from the Defendant.