However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Despite the fact that the Defendant is not a person handling narcotics, around August 8, 2013, around 17:30, the Defendant purchased 300,000 won to C in the vicinity of the luminous field, and approximately 0.4g of the Meptamins contained in C in the single-use injection machine.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement by the prosecution against C;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes concerning an investigation report;

1. Articles 60(1)2, 4(1)1, and 2 subparag. 3(b) of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, Etc. concerning the criminal facts

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Social service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;

1. In view of the fact that there are many criminal convictions for the same kind of sentencing under Article 67 of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, Etc., it is necessary to impose severe punishment on the defendant. However, considering the fact that the defendant's proposal causes the crime (negative), the fact that the crime was committed in depth, the fact that the defendant has no record of criminal punishment until then, since 2008, the spouse and his wife are supported with four years of age, and that social ties are evident, such as sincere work, and that the defendant seems to face excessive difficulties for his/her family's livelihood if he/she is detained for a long time, the punishment shall be determined as ordered by the disposition.