2. Although there is no favorable circumstance such as the fact that the defendant led to the confession of the crime of this case and stated that the mistake is divided in depth, the crime of violation of the Game Industry Promotion Act committed by the defendant is an act that has to be eradicated by serious social harm by encouraging excessive speculative spirit among the general public. The crime of aiding and abetting the criminal is also difficult to discover substantial truth and requires strict punishment for a crime that interferes with the state's criminal justice function, the defendant has the same criminal record, and other various circumstances that are conditions for the sentencing of this case, such as the defendant's age, character and behavior, character, intelligence and environment, the background and consequence of the crime of this case, the degree of participation, the size and business period of the game of this case, business profit, circumstances after the crime, family relations, etc., the defendant's punishment imposed by the court below is proper and too unreasonable. Thus, the defendant's assertion is not justified.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

[In accordance with the application of the amendment of indictment made by the prosecutor at the trial, the "person who has not received the name" as stated in the judgment of the court below shall be changed to "person who has not received the name (F.I. President)"