When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

At around 13:00 on March 27, 2016, the Defendant: (a) granted to the victim D (58 years of age) the opening value purchased at KRW 3,00,000 prior to a few months prior to the Defendant’s house located in Syang-gun C to deliver it to the said owner; (b) however, the Defendant thought that the victim did not deliver it to the opening owner, and (c) determined that “I would have not given the victim’s face to fright, why you would have not given the face value; (d) 3-4 times the face of the victim, left back, and 20 times the chest part of the chest part, the Defendant sawd the victim as 3-4 times the face of the victim, and 3-4 times the chest part of the chest part, and 20 times the chest part of the chest part of the chest part of the chest wall that requires treatment for about

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Partial statement of witness D;

1. Partial statement of the police interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. Some statements made in the police interrogation protocol regarding D;

1. Some statements in the D statements;

1. Investigation report (on-site photographs, photographs of damage, etc.);

1. A medical certificate;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on site photographs;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of penalties;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The portion not guilty under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order

1. Around 13:00 on March 27, 2016, the summary of the facts charged was as follows: (a) around 13:00, the Defendant: (b) given the Defendant’s family fry in Yangyang-gun, Namyang-gun, a few months prior to the previous month to the victim D to deliver to the opening; (c) however, the Defendant thought that the Defendant did not deliver to the opening, and (d) determined that “I would have not given the opening value”; (b) the Defendant’s arm’s length part of the part of the victim’s arm’s length of the Defendant’s arms was computed twice at approximately two weeks for the victim, and then the Defendant was in a scarfy of the scarke wall that requires treatment for about two weeks.

2. Determination

A. The Defendant denies this part of the facts charged from an investigative agency to this court, and there is a statement in D as evidence that seems to correspond to this part of the facts charged.

However, the following circumstances are as follows: