손해배상(자)
1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the defendant exceeding the following amount ordered to be paid shall be revoked.
1. The court's explanation on this part of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except where part of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is modified as stated in the following Paragraph 2. Thus, this part is cited by applying the main text of Article 4
2. The 2nd 19 and 20th 20 of the written judgment of the court of first instance (Article 2-2(b)) shall be written in the following parts:
B. However, under the following circumstances, Gap evidence Nos. 2 and 4 (the number of pages is included in each number, Eul's statements and the entire purpose of arguments, namely, ① the accident occurred when the plaintiff was crossing without permission at a place where the crosswalk is not installed, ② the place where the accident occurred is a road at the speed of 80km per hour, and the center line is installed, and it is sufficiently anticipated that other vehicles, including the defendant vehicle, including the defendant vehicle, will proceed at a considerable speed. ③ Furthermore, the accident occurred around the time of the accident, and the passage of the road seems to have been considerably restricted in the view of the following circumstances: ④ The accident occurred when the plaintiff, an acting driver, as the above, was crossing the road in this case without permission, and the accident occurred at the center line, and the road environment is installed, and it is sufficiently anticipated that the other vehicles including the defendant vehicle, including the defendant vehicle, were moving at a considerable speed, and the accident occurred without permission. < Amended by Presidential Decree No. 20720, Apr. 2, 1998>