However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

1. On December 25, 2014, the Defendant violated the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (accidents, Violence, etc.) on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (hereinafter “Aggravated Punishment, etc.”) was on board the head of F taxi operated by the victim E (the age of 58) prior to D located in Gwangju Mine-gu, Gwangju, and was willing to arrange for transmission to the victim, and then again considered the victim as a bath for calculation, the Defendant sustained bodily injury, such as double gambling, etc. which requires approximately 2 weeks of treatment by taking about 10 times the face and head of the victim being driven by drinking with his/her accurate destination.

Accordingly, the defendant assaulted the driver of a vehicle in operation and caused the injury.

2. When the Defendant was boarding a taxi operated by the victim E at the time and place described in paragraph (1) and passed the airport shooting distance, the Defendant destroyed the property owned by the victim to the extent that the repair cost would be borne by 848,758 won, such as a hump lamps exchange, by walking the hump on the front side of the hump of the stale of the stal on the stale of the stale of the stale of the stale of the stale of the stale

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the injury diagnosis certificate and quotation;

1. Article 5-10 (2) (former part) and (1) of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes and Article 366 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts and Article 5-10 (2) (former part) of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes for the

1. From among concurrent crimes, Articles 37 (former part), 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act (within the scope of adding up the long-term punishment of two crimes)

1. Mitigation of discretionary mitigation under Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act (The following extenuating circumstances among the reasons for sentencing):

1. The reason for sentencing (the scope of sentencing) under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (the following sentencing has been considered to be more favorable for the reasons) is that of imprisonment with prison labor for not less than one year and six months, and not more than six years and six months.