임차보증금
1. The Defendant’s each of the KRW 8,750,000 against the Plaintiff (Appointed Party), the appointed parties C, and D, and each of them from October 8, 2015.
1. The following facts are acknowledged in light of the overall purport of the arguments in Gap evidence Nos. 1 and Gap evidence Nos. 5 (including each number) as to the cause of the claim.
① On March 7, 2011, the network E and the Defendant paid all the lease deposit after setting the lease deposit as KRW 35 million and the lease deposit as from April 1, 201 through April 1, 2011 to April 1, 2013.
② While the above lease was explicitly renewed, E was hospitalized at a hospital on March 2014, and notified the Defendant of the termination of the lease, and died on June 19, 2014.
③ The heir of the network E has children of the Plaintiff (Appointed Party) and Nonparty G.
④ The Plaintiff (Appointed Party) delivered the leased real estate to the Defendant.
According to the above facts, since the above lease contract was lawfully terminated by termination on March 2014, the defendant is obligated to pay damages for delay at each rate of 15% per annum from October 8, 2015 to the day of complete payment, as requested by the plaintiff (appointed party) and the selected party (appointed party) who are the deceased E's successors (appointed party) to each amount equivalent to their inherited portion (= KRW 8,750,000,000) and the plaintiff (appointed party).
2. The plaintiff (appointed party)'s claim of this case is reasonable, and it is so decided as per Disposition.