When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On August 24, 2016, at around 21:40, the Defendant: (a) stated the victim’s convenience store operated by the victim D (the 25-year old-old-old-old-si) with drinking alcohol in the form of drinking, to the victim’s 7-8 "I will know why I will know you will see if I will see it? I will see it? I will see the victim’s convenience store in the form of 7-8 unspecified customers on the ground that I will not see the victim’s response in the process of purchasing goods; and (b) I would like to see the victim’s “I will spath, spath, and spath;” (c) I would like to see the victim’s “spath, spath, spath, and spath,” and (c) would interfere with the victim’s business of convenience store by failing to enter the victim’s response and making it possible.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. CCTV video CDs;

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The sentencing conditions indicated in the records, such as the defendant's age, occupation, character and conduct, family relationship, and circumstances before and after the crime, under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, of the provisional payment order, shall be determined as ordered by taking into account the following circumstances:

Around 2012. Around 2012. The Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes) is a crime of violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes) and the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes), confessions and reflects that seven times of punishment have been imposed due to