2. The judgment shows the attitude of the defendant to reflect his mistake by recognizing the crime. The defendant agreed to pay the amount of damage to the victim and made efforts to recover damage, and the defendant's economic situation is not good. However, the crime of this case is the defendant by deceiving the victim, thereby taking clothes, etc. equivalent to the total market price of 3,320,000 won against the same victim. The defendant committed the crime of this case repeatedly against the same victim for about nine months. In full view of all other circumstances, such as the defendant's age, sex, sex, environment, family relationship, motive and circumstance of the crime, circumstances after the crime, etc., which are the conditions for sentencing as shown in the arguments, even if considering all favorable circumstances of the defendant, it cannot be deemed unfair because the sentence of the court below is too excessive and unfair. Thus, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.