However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

1. On January 13, 2008, the Defendant is expected to receive the order for construction from the victim, at the victim D management dispute settlement office located in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government C Building No. 506, for the victim’s execution of the construction project, the Defendant would receive the order for construction from the Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Office for Electric Construction Co., Ltd.

“.....”

However, in fact, the defendant thought that he will consume the money received from the injured party by personal living expenses or card payments, and he did not have the intention or ability to receive the electrical construction from the injured party.

On January 14, 2008, the Defendant: (a) by deceiving the victim; (b) obtained a delivery of KRW 200,000,000 from the victim under the pretext of the order of construction from the victim; and (c) obtained a remittance of KRW 2.3 million to the new bank account under the name of the Defendant on January 14, 2008; and (d) acquired a total of KRW 2.

2. FJ frauds related to the F forest have been the market price of 5 billion won against the victim D at the Medisium in January 2008, 2008, where the victim D had “F G forest.”

However, if you sell the picture, it is necessary to broadcast the broadcast production cost.

The phrase “a loan is made to repay the money in return for the sale of the forest.”

However, the above picture was received as a substitute for the payment of construction cost by H, which is the defendant's seat, and it is not clear whether the picture was a fruit, and there was only the idea of consuming the money received from the injured party with personal living expenses or credit card payment, and there was no intention or ability to repay it even if it was borrowed from the injured party.

On January 29, 2008, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as such, received KRW 10,000 from the victim for the purpose of borrowing money, and received KRW 50,000 on April 16, 2008, respectively. On April 23, 2008, the Defendant acquired KRW 11,150,000 in total from the victim five times in total, including by receiving KRW 11,150,00 from the bank account under the name of the Defendant his/her father, and by receiving KRW 1,1150,00 from the bank account under the name of his/her father, from January 10, 201.