On May 30, 2013, the Defendant filed a complaint with the victim on June 2013, 2013, on the suspicion that the Defendant acquired a interview recording file with G from the general situation room leader of the F Party Election Countermeasures Headquarters, which was stored in the victim’s cell phone, and provided it to other persons by acquiring the interview recording file from a majority of reporters created in the coverage activities by the victim.

On November 5, 2013, from around 14:00 to around 02:00 on November 6, 2013, the Defendant expressed an attitude of the police officer from around 14:0 to around 02:00, the Defendant sent the file seized by the Defendant to the world, and sent it to the U.S., and made it possible for the police officer to make a hump to make a hump of the victim in front of the instant case at the intelligence team video recording room, with the victim in front of the instant case. On the one hand, the Defendant humped the victim at once. The Defendant humpeded the victim at the time. The Defendant expressed his attitude that the Defendant would inflict any harm on the victim’s life and body, and had the police officer take a hump to make a hump of the victim’s reputation by sending it to the U.S., as the victim’s hump to the Internet.

2. Determination

A. In the crime of intimidation of relevant legal principles, intimidation generally refers to the notification of harm to the extent that it may cause fear to a person, and thus, an intentional act as a subjective constituent element of the crime is for the awareness that the actor is aware of such a threat, and actually the notified harm.