If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

1. 점유이탈물횡령 피고인은 2019. 5. 1. 13:20경 의정부시 B백화점 2층 푸드홀 'C' 식당 앞에서 피해자 D이 분실한 그 소유인 에어팟을 습득하였다.

The Defendant did not take necessary procedures, such as returning the acquired property to the victim, but did so.

Accordingly, the defendant embezzled the property that has been separated from the possession of the victim.

2. On May 1, 2019, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (unlicensed Driving) and driven a G 5-car owned by the Defendant without obtaining a driver’s license from around about 29 km section from the front day of the Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government apartment building Fdong to the front day of the Gu Government-si department department B department store.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Written statements of D;

1. CCTV analysis data and photographs of damaged articles;

1. 자동차등록원부, 자동차운전면허대장 (피고인은 점유이탈물횡령의 고의 및 불법영득의사가 없었다고 주장하나, 이 법원이 적법하게 채택하여 조사한 증거에 의하면, 점유이탈물횡령 범행 당시 피고인이 바닥에 떨어져 있는 에어팟 이어폰을 주워서 습득한 점, 피고인은 피해품 습득 후 피해품을 살핀 후 그대로 가져가 도주한 점을 인정할 수 있고, 피해품은 고가의 블루투스 이어폰인 점 등을 종합하면 피고인에게 점유이탈물횡령의 고의 및 불법영득의사가 충분히 인정된다.) 법령의 적용

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act, Article 360 (1) of the Criminal Act, Article 152 subparagraph 1 of the Road Traffic Act, and Article 43 of the Road Traffic Act, and the selection of fines, respectively, for the crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;