except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

피고인은 2014. 9. 21. 01:20경 인천 부평구 평천로153에 있는 광명아파트 정문 출입구 앞 노상에서 잠을 자고 있던 중 신고를 받고 출동한 인천부평경찰서 C지구대 소속 경장 D, 경위 E가 피고인을 깨워 귀가시키려고 하자 이에 화가 나 위 D, E에게 “왜 집을 물어보느냐, 내가 무엇을 잘못했느냐”라고 말하면서 그곳에 있던 광명아파트 경비초소 출입문을 발로 차고 “개새끼야, 넌 짭새 경찰복만 안 입었으면 나한테 죽었어”라고 욕하면서 손으로 D의 멱살을 잡고 흔들어 바닥에 넘어뜨린 후 D의 근무복 상의 흉장 및 단추를 잡아 뜯고 D의 뺨을 1회 때리고, 계속하여 피고인을 제압하여 순찰차 뒷좌석에 함께 승차한 위 E의 몸에 올라타 움직이지 못하게 눌렀다.

As a result, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on the maintenance of public peace and order, and at the same time, the victim D (the age of 37) needs to be treated for about two weeks.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement made to D and E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Grounds for sentencing under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Where the scope of the sentencing guidelines on the recommendation [the scope of the sentencing guidelines] general injury (the scope of the recommendation] general, the basic area (the April to one year and six months), the punishment (including the special mitigation), the non-compensation (including the serious effort for recovery of damage), or the considerable partial damage has been restored / Cases of obstruction of performance of official duties;

2. The fact that the defendant who was sentenced to the sentence of this case led to the confession and reflect of the crime of this case, that the defendant agreed with the victim D, that there is no past record of suspended execution or more, and that the defendant's age, character, conduct and environment