성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (unfair sentencing) of the lower court’s punishment (4 months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.
2. That there are circumstances to consider the instant crime, such as: (a) the Defendant’s mistake is against the Defendant; (b) there is a dependent, including the disabled’s children; and (c) the instant crime is committed against the attempted crime.
However, the motive for the crime of arranging sexual traffic is the motive for profit-making, and there is a lot of social harm. While the defendant has already been punished three times for the same crime, the defendant is not subject to the responsibility for the crime in this case.
The lower court sentenced the Defendant to the lower court, taking into account all the sentencing conditions stipulated in Article 51 of the Criminal Act, and sentenced to the lower court’s sentencing guidelines set forth in the sentencing guidelines by the Supreme Court sentencing committee. Such a lower court’s sentence is too unreasonable.
Therefore, the defendant's argument of sentencing is without merit.
3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is groundless.