beta
(영문) 대전지방법원천안지원 2015.04.24 2014가합1969

해고무효확인 등

Text

1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The relationship between the parties, etc. 1) The defendant is a company that manufactures and sells all kinds of internal combustion engine parts, and the plaintiffs are the defendant company's Agsan factory (hereinafter "Agsan factory").

)a factory and a Young-dong factory (hereinafter referred to as “ Young-dong factory”).

2) The Plaintiffs were working for the Korean Metal Workers’ Union LAF L (hereinafter referred to as “AM”) or the Young-dong Branch of the same union L (hereinafter referred to as “AM”) (hereinafter referred to as the “YAF”). The Plaintiffs were working for the Plaintiff by combining the above two branches.

B. On January 13, 2010, the Plaintiffs’ union and the Defendant Company entered into a “Agreement on the Improvement of Wages and Work-Based Systems (hereinafter “Agreement”) in 2009, including that “The purpose of introducing the two-way system on January 1, 201, taking into account economic situation and all the relevant conditions.” (2) On December 23, 2010, the Plaintiffs’ union demanded a special organization negotiation based on the said agreement with the Defendant Company, and accordingly, the Plaintiffs’ union and the Defendant Company continued a special bargaining over the said period from January 18, 201 to May 4, 2011.

3) The Plaintiffs’ Trade Union and Labor Relations Commission on May 3, 201 (hereinafter referred to as the “Hamnam Labor Relations Commission”) upon the occurrence of the said special negotiations.

(C) On March 24, 2011, the Plaintiffs’ unions and the Defendant Company continued the 6th special negotiations on the grounds of the change of work environment and the introduction of a monthly wage system, and the issues related to the production were discussed later, on May 13, 201, on the grounds of a significant difference in opinions between labor and management. (c) On March 24, 201, the Plaintiffs’ unions and the Defendant Company continued the 6th special negotiations. The Plaintiffs’ unions discussed the change of work environment and the introduction of a monthly wage system, and argued that the issues related to the production will be discussed later. Accordingly, the Defendant Company should take into account the securing of production.