However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The Defendant is the proprietor of the entertainment drinking house “C” located under B in luminous life.

On August 2, 2019, the Defendant provided alcoholic beverages to the name-free customers who visited the above entertainment bars, and provided entertainment with a female entertainment loan provided through the so-called “news entertainment”, and received entertainment expenses including 180,000 won for commercial sex acts from the above guest, and had the above guest and the above female entertainment loan be sent to Do at the time of light and one-time sexual intercourse at around 00:31 on August 3, 2019, the following day.

In addition, from the above date to September 22, 2019 to September 01:43, 2019, the Defendant: (a) provided female contact loans through the “news” through 18 times as shown in the attached list of crimes in the foregoing manner and the customers who found the above main points were sexual intercourse at the above telecom.

Accordingly, the defendant arranged sexual traffic for business purposes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Examination of the accused's suspect's interrogation statement by prosecution;

1. The application of Acts and subordinate statutes to search and seizure records of each police interrogation protocol against E and F concerning the copy of each police interrogation protocol, copies of the seizure list D business account book (a copy of the business account book referred to in subparagraph 1 attached) and investigation reports (the calculation of profits from sexual traffic)

1. Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic and the Selection of Imprisonment with labor concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The latter part of Article 25 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic, Etc. additionally collected under Article 48 (1) 1 of the Criminal Act;

1. The grounds for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order recognize the defendant's mistake, taking into account various sentencing conditions such as the defendant's age, character and conduct, environment, family relationship, motive and consequence of the crime, etc., the business period and amount of profits of the case, the defendant has no record of criminal punishment, and the defendant has no record of criminal punishment.