On October 16, 2016, 18:45 on October 16, 2016, the Defendant: (a) at the Pyeongtaek-si Police Station C police box located in Pyeongtaek-si B; (b) stated the facts that he/she was arrested as a current offender for the obstruction of performing his/her official duties; and (c) stated whether he/she “

누가 이렇게 만들어 놨냐

Chewing arnis, e.g., finite finites, will be discarded.

“Abridge” and the police box affiliated with the above police box shall be deemed to have been flapted with the bridge E.

As a result, the defendant assaulted police officers who were performing legitimate duties on criminal investigation and interfered with the execution of official duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. Statement of the police statement to E: 1. Application of each photographic statute;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense;

1. Reasons for sentencing selecting a sentence of imprisonment with prison labor [the scope of the recommended sentence] The reasons for the sentencing of choosing a sentence of imprisonment with prison labor [the scope of the punishment] [the person who has been subject to special sentencing] [the person who has been subject to special sentencing] and does not have any basic area (six months to one year and four months] [the person who has been subject to special sentencing]: The confession of this case at an investigative agency; the confession of this crime was made by the investigative agency; the person who has no record of criminal punishment after entering the Republic of Korea; the fact that there is a high possibility of criticism for this case; the fact that the victimized police officer wants to be punished against the defendant; and other sentence that is sentenced by the defendant: The defendant'