The defendant and D are married couples in divorce litigation.

1. On July 201, 201, the Defendant forged private document: (a) stated “D” in the applicant column, “E” in the resident registration number column, “F” in the cell phone column, “G” in the cellular phone column, and “D” in his own member column, using a black tool for verification on the application for a credit card kept in the place at the NAF YY YY YY YY YY YYY YYYY YYYYYY YYYYYYYYYYY YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY

Accordingly, for the purpose of uttering, the Defendant forged two copies of a credit card membership application in the name of D, a private document related to rights and obligations.

2. The Defendant, at the same time and at the same place, delivered an application for membership of a forged credit card to a bank employee, who was aware of such forgery, as if it were a document duly formed.

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of witness D;

1. Application of replies to requests for financial transaction information;

1. Relevant Article 231 of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, Articles 234 and 231 of the Criminal Act, and the choice of fines, respectively;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Penalty fine of 500,000 won to be suspended;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act (in cases of the inducement in a workhouse, 50,000 won a day);

1. Article 59 (1) of the Criminal Act (including the first offender in the case of the defendant and the fact that the victim does not want the punishment);