A A shall be punished by a fine of one million won, and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of five hundred thousand won.

The above fine is imposed against the Defendants.

1. On June 14, 2019, the Defendants, without authority, concluded an I apartment construction contract on the E-2 floor located in Daejeon-dong, Daejeon-gu, Daejeon-gu, for the purpose of exercising no qualification as the representative director of C, on June 14, 2019, with respect to the project site of the E-2 floor, the F representative G and the 8 lots outside H-si, where C has a business right, and entered into a construction contract on the construction project site of the 8 lots outside H-si, Jeong-si, where the Company C has a business right, using a computer, the Defendants entered the construction name column into the construction name column “I Apartment-si Construction Work, I-Eup, and eight lots outside H-si, Jeonnam-si, the construction site column “On June 18, 2019, completion date of construction in 202,” and the contract price column “Won 4,100,000,000 won (hereinafter “Defendant 68,200,000”).”

As a result, the Defendants conspired with the above C's representative director qualification and forged one copy of the standard contract for construction works, which is a private document on rights and duties.

2. The Defendants, at the above date and at the above place, delivered the standard contract form for construction works, which was prepared with the qualification as above, to F representative G of the Co., Ltd., who knew of the fact that the contract form was duly formed.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. The suspect interrogation protocol against the Defendants

1. Written statement made by the police of J and documents attached thereto;

1. Although the Defendants seem to dispute the facts charged, the Defendants held a general meeting of shareholders and a board of directors on May 10, 2019 with the content that the Defendants dismissed the existing representative director J and appointed Defendant A as the inside director.