2. The judgment of the defendant is in conflict with the mistake of the crime of this case, and health is not good, and there are circumstances in which economic benefits are difficult.

However, even though the Defendant had been punished for a traffic-related crime in 2011, he again committed the instant crime.

At the time, blood alcohol concentration was 0.157% higher.

Drinking driving is a serious crime threatening the lives and bodies of himself/herself and others.

Examining the sentencing conditions indicated in the records and arguments of this case, including equity in the punishment with other similar cases, including the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, and method and result of crime, it is difficult to deem that the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.