If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a D's car.

On November 04, 2012, around 21:30 on the 21:0 on the 21:30th day of Pyeongtaek-si, the Defendant changed the lane to the national road side of the Home Pung-dong along the two-lanes on the scamburg, along the two-lanes on the scamburg.

In this case, there was a duty of care to inform the direction change in advance and to change the lanes safely by taking into account the traffic situation of the front and rear left.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and instead changed the lane to the left side of the vehicle, and received the Fbe-cracked vehicle's right side side to the left side of the Defendant's vehicle due to the negligence of changing the lane to the left side of the vehicle.

As a result, even though the damaged vehicle damages the repair cost of 1,204,320 won to the damaged vehicle, it was immediately stopped and escaped without taking measures such as aiding the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of witness E and G in part;

1. Reports on traffic accidents and reports on the occurrence of traffic accidents;

1. Written estimate or photograph of the damaged vehicle;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes concerning black stay images;

1. Relevant Articles 148 and 54 (1) of the Road Traffic Act and the choice of fines for criminal facts;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Judgment on the assertion by the defendant and his/her defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. Part concerning measures not yet taken after the accident

A. The Defendant asserts to the effect that he did not have any criminal intent since he was unaware of the occurrence of an accident at that time.

B. The following circumstances acknowledged by each evidence of the judgment, i.e., the Defendant’s vehicle and the damaged vehicle are proceeding in the same direction, and it is confirmed that the Defendant shocked on the right side of the damaged vehicle during the change of the vehicle, and that the shocked by the black image installed inside the damaged vehicle is also shocked immediately by the victim E.