손해배상(기)
1. The judgment of the first instance court, including the claims expanded and reduced in this court, shall be modified as follows:
1. The scope of the judgment of this court in the first instance against the defendant at the court of first instance, the plaintiff filed the lawsuit of this case seeking payment of the amount calculated at the rate of 15% per annum from the day following the delivery of a copy of the complaint of this case to the day of full payment. The court of first instance accepted the part of the plaintiff's claim for the medical expenses of first instance and accepted part of the claim for damages and damages. The plaintiff filed an appeal only against the part against the plaintiff in the claim for damages of this case. The plaintiff's ground for starting damages damages in advance at the court of first instance is apparent in the record that the plaintiff extended the time of calculating damages in advance on April 4, 2016. Thus, the scope of the judgment of this court in the first instance to the part of the claim for damages of this case, which was the object of judgment, and the part of the plaintiff's loss from the part of the claim for damages of this case, within the scope of the damages incurred within the scope of the damages incurred by the plaintiff (the damages incurred by the plaintiff).
A. The facts of recognition 1) On April 4, 2016, the Defendant, at the office located in Yasan City, around 10:50 on April 4, 2016, caused the Plaintiff’s death with D’s spouse, and caused the Plaintiff’s flab, and caused the Plaintiff’s face by drinking and flabing, etc., and caused the Plaintiff to undergo approximately four weeks’s injury (hereinafter “the instant injury”).
(2) On September 21, 2016, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 3 million with a fine of KRW 200,000 with respect to the above criminal facts under the Jeonju District Court 2016 High Court 201 High Court 3664 (hereinafter “instant criminal trial”), and the said summary order became final and conclusive around that time.
[Ground of recognition] The entry of Gap evidence No. 1 and the purport of the whole argument
B. According to the above facts of recognition of liability, the defendant assaulted the plaintiff and inflicted an injury.