However, the Defendants are above two years from the date of the final judgment.

The Defendants did not deal with clophophones (one philophone, hereinafter philophones), which is a local mental medicine, because they are not the narcotics handler, but the Defendants A received and administered philophones as follows, and Defendant B administered philophones.

1. On March 2016, the Defendants jointly committed the crime: (a) at the residence of Pyeongtaek-si D 202 E, the Defendants: (b) sticking two strings immediately on the bottle in which water is stored; and (c) opened a smoke by heating a penphone received from E in the first place; and (d) purified the water in the water and administered the smoke emitted as soon as possible on the other side through E and prosperity.

2. Defendant A

A. On March 2016, the Defendant received philophones in the middle 15:00 on the housing distance of the members of Ansan-si, the Defendant received the philophones from F in a way that he receives the philophones from F free of charge the philoopon (one philoopon) of f.

B. On March 2016, 2016, the studio F of the 2nd floor of the studio building located in the Dong-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Ansan-si, and the extension of the studiophones was administered by shampers in a way such as paragraph 1.

(c)

On March 2016, the Defendant received philophones in a way that philophones received from the Defendant’s residence in Pyeongtaek-si H, and from E free of charge, such as paragraph 2-A.

3. On April 2016, Defendant B: (a) was administered in the dwelling of the Defendant of Pyeongtaek-si, Pyeongtaek-si; and (b) was administered in a way such as paragraph (1).

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. The protocol concerning the interrogation of the Defendants to the prosecution

1. Copy of the protocol concerning the examination of suspect with respect to F; and

1. A written statement on the date of each urinal test, the entry and departure status of each individual, and the result of preliminary examination for narcotics;

1. The application of Acts and subordinate statutes to each investigation report (the calculation of an additional collection charge and attachment of a suspect's response to a motion for suspect;

1. Article 60(1)2 of the Act on the Management of Narcotics, Etc., for which relevant criminal facts are applicable, and Articles 60(1)1 and 2 of the Act on the Management of Narcotics, etc., for which punishment is selected.