Defendant

A shall be sentenced to the above punishment for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Defendant

A is a person who actually operates H gas stations located in Gunsan City, and Defendant B is the owner of the H gas station in Kun, J Truck, Defendant C is the owner of K, L, M, N Truck, Defendant D is the owner of O truck, Defendant E is the actual owner of P truck, Defendant F is Q, R, and S.

The Defendants, using the subsidy of KRW 345.54 per liter via trucking transport for the purpose of trucking operation in the Si of Kunsan-si, paid a false amount of money calculated as excessive as 10 to 20% of the actual volume of oil, using a truck purchase card, and had the intent to receive the subsidy by fraud to submit the false receipt to the Kunsan-si.

1. On January 7, 2016, Defendant A and Defendant B’s fraud: (a) even though Defendant B provided transit equivalent to KRW 245,00 on his own cargo vehicle, Defendant B paid KRW 275,00 with the freight vehicle purchase card of Defendant B and notified the department in charge of Gunsan to pay KRW 275,00,00 as if the settlement was limited to that of Defendant B’s truck purchase card; and (b) from that year, Defendant A and Defendant B deceiving a public official in charge of Gunsan to receive KRW 73,253 as a subsidy by deceiving the public official in charge of Gunsan-si to receive the payment of KRW 73,253 as a subsidy.

3. From 17. up to 17. A total of 35 times as shown in the list of crimes in Appendix 2,831,624 subsidies was received.

As a result, Defendant A and B were provided property by deceiving the victim in collusion.

2. On January 4, 2016, Defendant A and Defendant C’s fraud Defendants committed by Defendant A at H gas station operated by Defendant A, and the fact is as follows: (a) Defendant C’s cargo vehicle despite Defendant C’s arrival of transit equivalent to KRW 292,00 on its own cargo vehicle; (b) Defendant C’s transit equivalent to KRW 332,00,000, on the other hand.