Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one million won shall be the one day.

Around 21:00 on October 24, 2019, the Defendant expressed his desire to prevent the delivery of the victim D(16 years of age, South) and the victim E (16 years of age, South) on the front road in Kimhae-si B, on the ground that the victim D(16 years of age, South) prevents delivery, and again heard that the victim D’s “I would like to talk that I would like to read “I would not have been able to pass due to due process,” and that I would like to talk that I would have “I would not pass due to due process,” and that I would like to take back the victim D’s back at one time on the hand, and that I would like to look at the victim E-W on the ground that I would have “I would go in compliance with this,” and that I would like to see if I would am son or son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son her left.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement and police statement of the victims;

1. Photographs;

1. Reports on internal investigation, investigation reports and application of Acts and subordinate statutes attached thereto;

1. Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act as to the facts constituting the crime;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment (a fine not exceeding 500,000 won prosecuted for summary punishment);

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for not less than Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.