If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Around July 22, 2012 to February 23, 2012, the Defendant drafted a false complaint stating that “A, the Defendant, E, and the Defendant, using a computer, arbitrarily create a service contract and deliver the service contract to the Seoul Central District Court, so that E would be subject to criminal punishment.”

However, the above service contract was prepared by the defendant and E, and there was no forgery of E at will.

On July 24, 2012, the Defendant submitted the above complaint to the police officer in charge at the public service center of the Seoul Central Police Station in Jung-gu Seoul Central Police Station, which was located in 27 (low-dong 2A) as a check in Jung-gu Seoul Central Police Station,

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Partial statement of witness E;

1. Statement made by a witness F in the third protocol of the trial;

1. Copy of the complaint;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to each service contract, business registration certificate, each lease contract (in an investigation record, 91 pages, 93 pages);

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Article 156 of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;