However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

At around 23:50 on May 14, 2013, the Defendant driven a 5-meter D 2 freight vehicle from the gambae of the pamba-dong, Seo-gu, Daejeon to the gamba-dong at the intersection in front of the direction of the operation, while under the influence of alcohol content 0.276%.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to reports on proper initiative of, and reports on the statement of status of, a prime driver;

1. Relevant Article 148-2 (2) 1 and Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the facts constituting the crime;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor as a matter of choice (including the fact that a person commits the same kind of crime has been repeatedly committed even three times before the previous conviction of a fine due to driving);

1. Article 53 or 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation (see, e.g., distance and circumstances of driving);

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (including the fact that there is no criminal record of suspended sentence of imprisonment or more), reflect, etc.);

1. Article 62-2 (1) of the Criminal Act, Article 59 of the Act on Probation, etc.;