However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On July 2013, 2013, the Defendant came to know of the victim F of the victim F, who was aware of through the introduction of Doin E at the 2nd coffee shop in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, Seoul, the second floor of the C building, is between the Defendant and the Chairperson.

If the inside of Korea is only one word, it may be possible to supply molds and powder to the department stores.

A false statement was made to the effect that “The cost of street for the relevant persons is changed.”

However, the Defendant thought that he did not have any relationship with the Chairman and used the money received from the victim as personal living expenses, so the victim did not have the intent or ability to let the victim deliver the molds to the department store.

Nevertheless, on September 3, 2013, the Defendant: (a) by deceiving the victim; and (b) received each remittance of KRW 10 million from the corporate bank account in the name of G, the Defendant’s wife on September 3, 2013; and (c) KRW 10 million from the same account on September 15, 201.

Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with respect to F;

1. A complaint;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of investigation reports and investigation reports;

1. Relevant Article 347 of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution (the fact that the fact that it is against the other party, the fact that part of the amount of damage has been deposited, the amount of damage, the previous conviction of the accused, the age, sex, environment, etc. after the closure of pleadings);