교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)등
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Punishment of the crime
1. The Defendant is a person who has driven a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol on September 11, 2009 (the issuance of a summary order of KRW 2 million at the source of water sources on January 22, 2010), driven a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol on July 30, 2012 (the issuance of a summary order of KRW 3 million at the source of water sources on October 31, 2012), and violated Article 44(1) of the Road Traffic Act on at least two occasions.
On June 26, 2018, at around 00:10, the Defendant driven a B-R-V car under the influence of alcohol with approximately 4.5m alcohol concentration at approximately 0.159% in alcohol from the road near the Hanwon-gu, Suwon-si, Suwon-si to the road front of the Jinwon-gu, Youngwon-si, Youngwon-si, Youngwon-si, the Sinwon-si.
2. The Defendant violated the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents (Bodily Injury) is a person engaging in driving a vehicle B mixed with CR-V car.
On June 26, 2018, the Defendant driven the said car under the influence of alcohol content of 0.159% among blood transfusions on June 26, 2018, and proceeded along the three-lanes in the direction of the Sinhee University from the direction of the Sinhee University, along the road front of the 981-2 in the Young-gu, Young-gu, Young-gu, Sinwon-si, Sinwon-si, the Defendant stopped along the three-lanes in the direction of the Sinhee University.
In such cases, there was a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by safely driving a driver who is engaged in driving of a motor vehicle, such as taking the front door well and accurately operating the steering gear and steering gear.
Nevertheless, under the influence of alcohol, the Defendant was negligent in operating the vehicle device of the Defendant, while driving the said mixed vehicle of the Defendant at a front line, and was driven by the Defendant at the two-lanes of the Victim C(51) driving, which was parked in the signal waiting route from the front line, following the Defendant’s vehicle of the victim C(51). The Defendant was driven by the Defendant’s vehicle of the front line.
Ultimately, the Defendant’s negligence in performing the above duties, thereby causing injury to the victim C, such as salt, tension, etc. in light of the trend that requires approximately two weeks of treatment, and is so detached.