However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On January 8, 2013, at the office of “D” located in the Busan Dongdong-gu, Busan, the Defendant reported 112 to the said office after putting the knife knife and pressure the knife, and around June 21, 2013, the Defendant heard that “E was indicted and tried by non-detained, and “I will die the Defendant upon the completion of the judgment.”

From around 11:40 on June 21, 2013 to 14:15 on the same day, the Defendant interfered with the management of the above office of the victims by force, such as the victim F and the victim G, who are in charge of overall management of the above office, such as the payment of subsidies at the entrance of the above office prior to the above office, including “the aged and the aged”, “the aged and the aged shall kids, string, opening, string the same string, singing, and singkeing,” etc., of the victim F and the victim G.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of the police statement-related Acts and subordinate statutes to F;

1. Relevant Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (i.e., confession and reflectiveness, non-compliance with punishment, etc.);

1. Probation and community service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;