유족보상.장의비부지급처분취소
1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Purport of claim and appeal
The first instance court.
The reasoning for the court's explanation of this case is as stated in the reasoning of the first instance court's judgment, except for the modification of the following "the amended part" among the judgment of the first instance, and therefore, this case is cited in accordance with Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.
Nos. 4, 10 to 11 of the revised part, “F, the head of the welfare team, is the head of the welfare team,” and “F, the head of the welfare team before the network, was the person in charge of the management of the welfare team.”
In Chapter 4, the following "However, the deceased entered the basic work of the aforementioned raw material computer computer program in terms of the relationship with the computer," and "the deceased could only deal with the x-cellul program to the extent that the sum and average is sought as a chemical engineering and origin," and thus, "the deceased could only deal with the above".
Part IV, Chapters 20 through 5 shall be deleted.
In the 6th page 14, the testimony of the witness G is called “each testimony of the witness G and the witness F of the first instance trial.”
In conclusion, the judgment of the court of first instance is legitimate, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.