When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

At around 15:00 on April 9, 2015, the Defendant: (a) committed an assault, such as francing a frobbbing off the franced vehicle that the Defendant, as a parking manager of the Seongdong-gu Office, controlled the Defendant as an illegal parking vehicle on the ground that the Defendant: (b) carried the controlled vehicle on which the said F was on board; and (c) francing the franced vehicle on the ground that the Defendant, as a parking manager, carried the vehicle into a monthly parking vehicle; and (d) francing the franced vehicle on the franced vehicle.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the parking control of public officials.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement concerning F;

1. An investigation report (a report confirming whether a parking control official is a public official);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs and applications for business trips;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of fines, and the choice of fines;

1. The reasons for sentencing under Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act are obstructing the performance of official duties by exercising violence against public officials parked in the police station. However, the sentence of a fine like the order shall be imposed in consideration of the following factors: (a) the defendant is against himself/herself when committing the instant crime; (b) the degree of assault and obstruction of official duties is relatively minor; (c) the defendant has no criminal record for the same kind of crime; and (d) the defendant has no criminal record; and (c) the age, character and conduct, environment, motive or background of the relevant crime;