However, the above imprisonment for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The defendant is a person in a de facto marital relationship with E who works in C's D operated by C.

1. The Defendant would, on May 14, 2014, pay on behalf of the Defendant the amount of KRW 1.5 million paid to E in front of G kindergarten G kindergarten in Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Cheongju, and C’s salary to E.

Before making a conversation with C on the ground that it does not make any payment on the basis of a mobile phone, such as whether or not it will not give C any money by telephone with a mobile phone, and even after the conversation has been completed, C was on the side without the completion of a mobile phone call.

H과 피고인에 대하여 “ 휴대폰을 싸우면서 부쉈다고

At present, 1.5 million won shall be franchises.

The issue is that we need to see and see, and you need to see why we cannot see why we do not see.

h. Linnasium, flusium, flusium, flusium, flusium;

He heard conversations with the contents of “,” etc. and recorded them with the Defendant’s cell phone.

The defendant recorded a conversation between others that is not open to the public.

2. On May 27, 2014, the Defendant filed a complaint against C as defamation with the police station south-gu, Cheongju-si, Cheongju-si, and submitted a record of recording as stated in paragraph 1 of the above provision.

Accordingly, the defendant revealed the contents of conversation between others that are not open to the public.

Summary of Evidence

1. Entry of a defendant in part in the protocol of second public trial;

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of each police suspect against the accused;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a copy or recording of a complaint;

1. Article 16 (1) 1, the main sentence of Article 3 (1) of the Act on the Protection of Communications Secrets (a point of recording conversations between other persons) concerning criminal facts, Article 16 (1) 2 and 1, and the main sentence of Article 3 (1) of the Act on the Protection of Communications Secrets (a point of divulging conversations between other persons) concerning criminal facts;

1. The aggravated punishment for concurrent crimes: the former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Article 38 (1) 2, and Article 50 of the same Act (the punishment for a violation of the Protection of Communications Secrets due to the divulgence of conversations between other persons with heavy quality and the aggravated punishment for each concurrent crime)

1. Reduction of a small amount;