Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

1. On January 24, 2016, the Defendant entered 11 e-mail 11, 3,000 commercial buildings operated by the victim E-art Co., Ltd. between 10:15 and 3,000, and there are four game contents (3DS) with the market price of 225,000 won, the market price of other victim Co., Ltd. 4, 890,000 won at the market price of Doz. 8,000, the Defendant continued to use the e-mail 1,000 Doz. with the 3th floor of the above e-mail and 1,000 Doz. 1,000 Doz. with the 3th floor of the above e-mail and 1,000 Doz. 24,000 Doz. with the 3th Doz. 3,024,00 Doz.

2. In the date, time, and place mentioned in paragraph (1) above, the Defendant attempted to remove a sprink (defluence) by using spack spack spack spack spack spack spack spack spack spacks, the market value of which is equivalent to KRW 39,00,00, the market value of the above victim’s company, and 248,000, the market value of the spack spack spack spacks of the above spack spack spacks. However, the Defendant failed to do so and failed to do so.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. C’s statement;

1. A protocol of seizure and a list of seizure;

1. Application of spathy photographs and CCTV-related Acts and subordinate statutes in spathy;

1. Relevant Article 329 of the Criminal Act, Articles 342 and 329 of the Criminal Act, Articles 342 and 329 of the Criminal Act, and the selection of fines for the crime;

1. Article 37 of the Aggravation of Concurrent Crimes Act.