2. It is recognized that the judgment of the defendant recognized the crime of this case and reflects the fact that the victim did not have an injury due to the crime of this case, and that the defendant is economically difficult without good health.

However, considering the fact that the Defendant had previously been sentenced to a punishment for the same kind of crime, the fact that there is no yet agreement with the victim, and the lower court, taking into account all the circumstances favorable to the Defendant, which are the conditions of sentencing indicated in the record, including the Defendant’s age, environment, family relationship, occupation, and motive leading to the instant crime, the sentence of the lower court is unreasonable.

Defendant’s assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.