On July 22, 2017, the Defendant attempted to find out C, which is the house of the person in Macheon-si B, 17:25 on July 22, 2017, and caused her dismissal, thereby entering E, which is the residence of the victim D(62 years of age).

The defendant saw the victim's face by his hand on account of the victim's leakage, and took the victim's face by drinking.

As a result, the Defendant inflicted an injury on the victim, such as a spathal of a baby who needs to be treated for about four weeks.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of witness D;

1. Part of the police statement concerning D;

1. Report on internal investigation, report on investigation (request for appraisal and result of appraisal of DNA clothing and cremation DNA) and report on investigation (A's opinion on the Gu's Dogne Measures);

1. An injury diagnosis certificate and each medical certificate;

1. The defendant asserts that the defendant's argument of each photograph of the defendant is that the victim had a deadly weapon or its similar article first affixed with a deadly weapon or its similar article, and the victim was only defended, and there was no fact that the victim had been committed several times

As alleged by the Defendant, the facts reported by the Defendant on his own by suffering injuries on his part at the time of the instant case are recognized in the records.

However, each of the above evidences and the following facts and circumstances recognized by the above evidence, namely, the victim stated the same purport as the facts charged at this court and the investigative agency, and stated that he did not have any fact of prices of the defendant using a deadly weapon, etc., witness stated that the victim was not in possession of a deadly weapon, etc. at the time of the occurrence of the case, and that the victim was covered by the scambing of the victim at the time of the occurrence of the event, and that the victim's clothes were not covered by the scambring of the defendant, and that the victim's scam cannot be seen as being a body by the Defendant's scambling tool. At the time of the dispatch of the police, the victim was faced with the victim's electric scambing of the victim.