beta
(영문) 서울고등법원 2015.07.15 2014나2051914

손해배상(기)

Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is all dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

1. The reasons for the court's explanation of this case are as follows: "At the bottom of the 3th judgment of the first instance court, Defendant B pointed out that "the construction of the entire building requires electricity while inspecting the electrical equipment of the above building on November 24, 2009." The Korea Electrical Safety Corporation also requested D, the owner of the above building, to "the replacement of the equipment of the worn-out equipment during the replacement cycle" on January 5, 201, but the replacement of the electric repair works or worn-out equipment was not made (Evidence 4-1, 2, and 5-1) upon the above land or request (Evidence 4-1, 5-1, 5-2, 5-2, 5-2, 5-2, 5-2, 4, 5-2, 5-2, 5-2, 5-2, 5-2, 5-2, 5-2, 5-2, 5-2, 5-2, 5-2, 4, 5-2, 4, 5-2, 5-2, appraisal of the above evidence evidence.

2. In conclusion, the judgment of the first instance is legitimate, and all of the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.