If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

On August 1, 2011, at around 11:10 on August 1, 201, the Defendant: (a) asked whether the Defendant was the father of the Defendant seated in Seongbuk-si, Sungnam-si; (b) asked the Victim D about whether he was a meal to the father of the Defendant, who was seated in the wheelchairs; (c) the Defendant argued that the Defendant was not seated on the other side, and argued that the Victim was a vision, and the Defendant was, by hand, injured the Victim’s breath, carried the breath, carried the breath, carried the bat, carried the Victim’s bat, carried the bat

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's partial statement in the first protocol of trial;

1. Statement made by witnesses D in the second protocol of the trial;

1. Each legal statement of witness E and F;

1. Each police suspect interrogation protocol against D or defendant (including the part of the defendant's statement in the second protocol against D);

1. Each police statement of the defendant and E;

1. A witness statement of E;

1. A certificate of injury, or an injury photograph;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to the complaint;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of penalties;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Judgment on the Defendant’s assertion under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. First, the Defendant asserted that he was assaulted by D while he was in F and his body fighting with D, and that he did not inflict any injury on D. Thus, according to each of the above evidence, the Defendant at the time of the instant case, when he was in flab with D and carried out his body fighting with D, was inflabed with D with D, and was inflabed with D’s flab, and carried out the above injury. At the time of the instant case, D was inflabed with D’s flab, and was inflad with D’s flab, and the Defendant’s flab with D’s flab, and attempted to prevent the Defendant from fighting with D by blocking the Defendant, but the Defendant and D’s f, who was the husband at the time, could not interfere with the body of D’s flab with D’s body

2. In addition, the Defendant may prevent D from entering the Defendant’s office.