beta
(영문) 서울고등법원 2017.08.17 2016나208701

손해배상

Text

1.The judgment of the first instance shall be modified as follows:

1. Defendant D and F shall be jointly with Defendant E and shall be attached to the Plaintiffs.

Reasons

Basic Facts

A. The reasoning for this part of the judgment by the court is as follows: “1. Basic Facts” among the reasons for the judgment of the court of first instance (from No. 5 to No. 16 to 8 of the judgment of the court of first instance)

It is the same as the corresponding part, except as mentioned in the paragraph, and thus, it is quoted in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

(b) The nine pages of the decision of the first instance shall be written in the following manner:

Plaintiff H 1,250 4,000 dong 28 September 21, 2012, J 2, 2012, for the acquisition price of the number of stocks (wons) acquired by the sequence 1, the number of stocks (wons) acquired by the sequence 4,00 dong 3 4,000 dong 3 on September 28, 2012, shall be transferred from the Plaintiff on November 14, 2012 to the Plaintiff on October 2, 2012, and the Plaintiff on September 22, 2012, transferred to the Plaintiff on September 22, 2012. < Amended by Presidential Decree No. 23798, Sep. 28, 2012; Presidential Decree No. 24200, Aug. 8, 2000; Presidential Decree No. 24250, Oct. 4, 2000; Presidential Decree No. 24250, Sep. 2, 2013>

5 Plaintiff K on October 9, 2012 4,500 4,000 10,000 east 6 Plaintiff L on October 18, 2012, and 4,500 10,000 east 7 Plaintiff M on November 13, 2012, 8 Plaintiff N on November 13, 2012, 8 Plaintiff N on November 13, 2012 4,000 20,000 east Plaintiff N on November 5, 2012, 200 4,000 20,000 dong 9 AA on October 5, 2012, 200 4,00 20,000 east Plaintiff A on October 1, 2012, 5,200 4,00 5,000 Ga A on October 1, 2014.

(Plaintiff’s attorney asserted as of September 25, 2013 the transfer date. However, in light of Gap’s evidence Nos. 14-2 and No. 48-1, the above assertion appears to be a clerical error. 10 Plaintiff’s 10O on November 21, 2012, Plaintiff P 11 on November 21, 2012, 300 4,000 9,200 9,200 12 Plaintiff I on September 25, 2012, Plaintiff No. 130 on September 25, 2012, Plaintiff No. 130 on September 25, 2013, Plaintiff Q. 13 on September 25, 2013, Plaintiff Q. 13 on September 25, 2012, Plaintiff Q. 200 on May 13, 201, Plaintiff Q. 13 on September 25, 2012

A total of 27,400 note 109,600 No. 8 of the first instance court ruling "Defendant G Office" is "Defendant F's office", "Defendant F shall be "Defendant F's office" and "Defendant F shall be two times on January 8, 2013 and February 5, 2013."