The Defendant is a person who is engaged in the operation of a taxi for Category C Laun other business purposes.

On November 23, 2014, the Defendant driven the above taxi on November 23, 2014, and turned ahead of the front of the 130 Handong-ro, Yeongdeungpo-gu, Seoul, for the new-ro of Yeongdeungpo-gu, Seoul, with approximately 56 km in Si speed, depending on the two-lanes between the 3-lanes towards the shopping center.

Since a crosswalk is installed on the front side and the vehicle signal was yellowly on and off, in such a case, there was a duty of care to check whether a person engaged in driving service is a person who sets the way to reduce the speed and to check the right and the right and the right well and the right and the right and the right are well and to drive safely.

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected this and got the victim D (the age of 27) who crosses the mash-in crosswalk to the right side from the left side of the defendant's running direction by the negligence, which led the victim to go beyond the road by receiving the victim D (the age of 27) from the front driver's seat.

Ultimately, even though the Defendant was injured by the above occupational negligence on the part of the victim due to the blood transfusion, the body frame of the body body, etc. of the victim, he immediately stopped and escaped without taking necessary measures, such as providing relief to the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement of E and F;

1. Reporting on investigation (verification of the state of a victim);

1. The actual condition survey report;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate;

1. Where there occurs a serious injury (one to three years) in the aggravated area (one to a person under special guard) (one to three years), or where there is a significant danger to his/her life due to escape (one to two types) [decision of sentence] in the case where the defendant wears a crosswalk after a traffic accident, Article 5-3(1)2 of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, the reason for sentencing of sentence for sentencing of imprisonment [the scope of recommending sentence].