However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The defendant is currently in the period of divorce between the victim B (n, 29 years of age) and the husband and wife under the law.

On September 16, 2016, the defendant, from the window C2 inside the window of Changwon-si, tried to have a dispute about the victim's home by telephone on September 16, 2016, and then the victim expressed his desire to enter the bank in order to move his/her his/her his/her father's home to his/her mother, and tried to get his/her hair back with his/her left hand one time, knife his/her head knife his/her head knife with his/her left hand, knife his/her head knife with his/her head knife with his/her

However, the Defendant, who failed to properly operate the ice cosmetic, saw a white light (28cm in total length, 15cm in length on the day), which is a dangerous object in the lash, and inflicted an injury on the victim, such as dump dump, sump, tension, etc., which requires approximately three weeks of medical treatment, even when the victim gets her hand to prevent it.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement concerning B;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the injury diagnosis certificate;

1. Articles 258-2 (1) and 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 53 and Article 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation (including the fact that the injured party does not want the punishment of the accused, the fact that the injured party reflects the punishment of the accused, and the primary fact that the injured party is the offender);

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;