A. The Defendant is the owner of Busan BG M (hereinafter “M”), and N had resided in M B01 free of charge from February 2003 to manage M buildings with the Defendant’s delegation.

B. Each Plaintiffs entered into a lease agreement with NN, lease deposit, and monthly rent regarding the subject matter of a contract on the date indicated below.

Plaintiff

A. 105 March 10, 201, 200,000 won KRW 2.281 March 3, 2008, KRW 201,000,000 KRW 2.5 million on March 3, 201, KRW 305,000 on December 202, 201, KRW 203.15 million on December 19, 201, KRW 2.403.5 million on August 201, KRW 205,00 KRW 2.5 million on August 24, 201, KRW 200,00 KRW 2.5 million on August 1, 2014, KRW 200,00 KRW 2.5 million on August 204, 201, KRW 2.5 million on December 302, 201, KRW 300,00 on July 14, 2010.

C. N was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for three years and six months at the Busan District Court on the ground that N was sentenced to the authority to conclude a lease agreement with monthly income, not with a lease agreement received from the Defendant, but with the authority to conclude the above lease agreement by deceiving the Plaintiffs, and the above judgment became final and conclusive as it is.

(In Busan District Court 2014 High Court 2014dan1982, 2014No2564). [Grounds for recognition] The facts that there is no dispute, Gap evidence 1 and 2, Gap evidence 1 through 13, Gap evidence 3-1 through 21, Gap evidence 4-11, Gap evidence 12, Eul's witness N's testimony, the purport of the whole pleadings.

2. The Plaintiff’s assertion that N is a person to whom the right of representation was granted to lease each subparagraph of M from the Defendant. As such, the Plaintiffs who concluded a lease agreement with the Defendant’s agent are the legitimate lessee.

N. The plaintiffs and N.