난민불인정결정취소
1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.
1. The reasoning of the lower court’s acceptance of the judgment of the first instance is as stated in the reasoning of the first instance judgment, except for adding the following judgments, and thus, it shall be quoted in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.
2. The Plaintiff asserts to the effect that there exists a well-founded fear of persecution on the ground of religion, since the Plaintiff is faced with a situation where the Plaintiff may be threatened with his/her life from a Muslim organization opposing the Plaintiff’s opening of the dog.
However, in full view of the national circumstances and religious composition of Ghana admitted by the evidence adopted earlier, the specific contents and nature of the Plaintiff’s argument, the Plaintiff’s entry route, and the background of the Plaintiff’s application for refugee status, it is insufficient to recognize that there exists a well-founded fear that the Plaintiff might be injured if he/she was injured by or returned to Ghana on the ground of his/her opening of life.
Therefore, the plaintiff's above assertion is not accepted.
3. Thus, the plaintiff's claim of this case shall be dismissed as it is without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.