Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

On June 29, 2015, the Defendant paid the principal by July 31, 2020, in currency with the victim's call loan counselor who belongs to the victim's call loan Co., Ltd. around Busan around the day of June 29, 2015.

“Falsely speaking,” and it received 3 million won from the injured party to the bank account of the Defendant on the 30th of the same month as the borrowed money.

However, in fact, even though the Defendant had income of 1.5 million won each month at the time, the Defendant was obligated to pay a debt equivalent to 21 million won to other loan companies, and even if the Defendant borrowed money from the damaged party, such as the interest expected to be paid for one month exceeds 900,000 won, it did not have the intent and

Ultimately, the Defendant deceivings the victim as above, and received three million won from the injured party.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. A complaint;

1. Details of transfer of loans and application of Acts and subordinate statutes on loan transaction contracts;

1. Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts and Article 347 of the choice of punishment;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;