beta
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2017.03.31 2017고단378

사기

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On July 3, 2006, the Defendant committed fraud against the victim D on July 3, 2006, around the residence of the complainant in Gangseo-gu Seoul Northern District, “The former husband was suffering from 30 billion won from her husband’s outer money, but received 4 billion won as consolation money in her husband’s hedging with the former husband. However, the head of the Tong who received money which did not solve the tax problem was seized.

Although the attachment was false, the Defendant, while there was no particular property at the time, and there was no money received as consolation money, the Defendant deceiving the victim and received 30,000 won from the injured party in the same manner from July 31, 2009, and deceiving the victim from the same time until July 31, 2009, and obtained a total of 17,196,154 won from the injured party as shown in Appendix I as shown in Appendix I.

2. On February 10, 2007, the criminal defendant against the victim F, in the beauty room of the victim F, located in Gangseo-gu Seoul, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, he received consolation money equivalent to KRW 4 billion with the former husband, and the said money is bound by the bank. However, although the bank borrowed the money to repay the money, the defendant did not have any particular property at the time, and there was no money received as consolation money, the defendant by deceiving the victim and received 300,000 won from the victim from the victim to May 5, 2009, and by deceiving the victim by the same method from May 5, 2009, the defendant obtained a total of KRW 56,840,000 from the victim as shown in Appendix II, as shown in Appendix II.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statements made to F and D;

1. Relevant Article 347 of the Criminal Act and Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act (including each injured party) and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor for the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Code, and Article 38.