The relevant defendant between the parties (hereinafter referred to as the "Defendant Corporation") is a public corporation that has its headquarters in the center of Daejeon-gu, Daejeon-gu and employs approximately 34,00 full-time workers and engages in railroad transportation, rolling stock maintenance, etc.

The Plaintiffs are the employees (vehicle managers) of Defendant Corporation I, and are members of the J Workers’ Union (hereinafter referred to as the “J Labor Union”) K branch.

On December 9, 2013, the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport announced a development plan for the railroad industry of the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport, and accordingly, the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport, on December 26, 2013, converted the structure of the Defendant Corporation into the structure of a holding company and its subsidiary on June 26, 2013, and the Suwon X (KTX) opened in 2015 was invested by the Defendant Corporation in 30% and 70% as public funds. The Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport established the Defendant Corporation as a subsidiary holding the right of management as a subsidiary holding the right of management, and announced a plan for the development of the railroad industry with the content of adopting the competition system between Seoul and Yongsan X (KTX) and Suwon X (KTX) as a subsidiary holding the right of management.

As a result, J No. 200 is a strike from December 9, 2013 to December 9, 2013 under the name of “the strike from December 31, 2013,” such as the opposition to the establishment of KTX (KTX) corporation, which is a part of the daily exchange of railroad films, and wage in 2013.

The Plaintiffs participated in the instant strike and refused to provide labor for 17 to 18 days. On February 25, 2014, the Defendant Corporation directed the employees under his/her control to suspend the inspection of the departure of the cargo train in order to reduce the hours of the construction of the cargo train on February 25, 2014.

J Labor union deemed that the integration of the above business was a prior measure for the restructuring of the movies and human resources of the railroads, and prevented its members from complying with the above instruction.

Accordingly, the plaintiff B, C, D, E, F, and G are cargo trains in breach of the direction of the defendant corporation.