However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

On March 8, 2016, the Defendant: (a) committed assault on the part of the Defendant, taking care of D while taking care of D, who was sent to the scene by the head of Sincheon Police Station C District D, who was sent to the site after receiving a report on 112 domestic violence related to the Defendant’s domestic violence, on March 8, 2016.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers on the investigation of crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the suspect of the accused;

1. Each police statement made to D or E;

1. A written statement;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes concerning violence, booming and photographing photographs;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution (see, e.g., Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (see, e., Supreme Court Decision 2009Da1